• Link to Facebook
  • Link to Youtube
  • Directions
  • Search
  • Donate
Tel 413-253-2848
Unitarian Universalist Society of Amherst
  • Home
  • Welcome
    • About Us
    • Our Minister and Staff
    • Our Elected Leaders
    • Social Justice
    • Getting Involved
      • Community Breakfast
    • Location and Accessibility
    • Rental of our Building
  • Religious Education
    • Overview
    • Birth – Preschool
    • Elementary K-5th
    • Middle School
    • Youth Group (6th-12th)
    • Young Adult Group
    • Adult Religious Education
    • Our Whole Lives (OWL)
  • Worship
    • About Worship
    • Upcoming Worship Services, 10:30 am Sundays
    • Sunday Service Videos
    • UUSA Blog
    • Music and Choir
    • Holidays and Traditions
    • Special Services
  • Member Resources
    • Getting Involved to Find Belonging
    • Mission and Bylaws
    • UUSA Annual Reports
    • UUSA Finances
    • Board and Congregational Meeting Minutes
  • News & Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Full Calendar
    • Weekly Announcements
    • 2025-2026 Concert Series
    • UUSA Blog
  • UUSA Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Archive for category: Uncategorized

The story of the Indian Boarding Schools

November 30, 2024/in Uncategorized/by Webmaster

Heather Cox Richardson posted the following blog which includes a history of the Indian Boarding Schools in Letters from an American, on November 29, 2024. This is being shared with the UUSA by the Indigenous Awareness Circle.  The UUSA has voted to support federal legislation to examine the history of Indian Boarding Schools. 

==================================================

In 2008, Congress passed and President George W. Bush signed into law an act making the day after Thanksgiving National Native American Heritage Day.

About a month ago, on Friday, October 25, President Joe Biden became the first president to visit Indian Country in ten years when he traveled to the Gila River Indian Community in Maricopa County, Arizona, near Phoenix. Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland traveled with him. The trip was designed to highlight the investments the Biden-Harris administration has made in Tribal Nations.

At a press gaggle on Air Force One on the way to Arizona, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre noted that under Biden, Tribal Nations have seen the largest direct federal investment in history: $32 billion from the American Rescue Plan and $13 billion through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to build roads and bridges, bring clean water and sanitation, and build high-speed Internet in Tribal communities.

Jean-Pierre added that First Lady Jill Biden has also championed Native communities, visiting them ten times to highlight investments in youth mental health, the revitalization of Native languages, and to improve access to cancer screening and cancer care in Native communities.

Secretary Haaland, herself a member of the Pueblo of Laguna, agreed that the Biden-Harris administration has brought “transformational change” to Native communities: “electricity on the Hopi Reservation in Arizona for homes that have never had electricity; protecting cultural resources, like salmon, which Pacific Northwest Tribes have depended on for thousands of years; new transportation infrastructure for the Mescalero Apache Nation in New Mexico that will provide a safer travel route and boost their economic development, their local economy; addressing toxic legacy pollution and abandoned oil and gas infrastructure that pollutes our air and water for the Osage Nation in Oklahoma; providing clean drinking water for Fort Peck in Montana.”

“Tribal leaders are experiencing a new era,” Haaland added. “They’re at the table. They’re being consulted.”

When Biden spoke at the Gila Crossing Community School, he said he was there “to right a wrong, to chart a new path toward a better future for us all.” As president of the United States, Biden formally apologized to the Native peoples—Native Americans, Native Hawaiians, Native Alaskans—for the U.S. government policy that forced Native children into federal Indian boarding schools.

The apology comes after the release of an Interior Department study, The Federal Boarding School Initiative, that Secretary Haaland directed the department to undertake in 2021. According to Assistant Secretary of the Interior Bryan Newland, a citizen and former president of the Bay Mills Indian Community (Ojibwe), the initiative was “a comprehensive effort to recognize the troubled legacy of Federal Indian boarding school policies with the goal of addressing their intergenerational impact and to shed light on the traumas of the past.”

The initiative set out to identify federal Indian boarding schools and sites, to identify the children who attended those schools and to identify their Tribal identities, to find marked and unmarked burial sites of the remains of Indian children near school facilities, and to incorporate the viewpoints of those who attended federal Indian boarding schools and their descendants into the story of those schools.

The report looked at the Indian education system from 1819 to 1969 as a whole, bringing together federal funding for religious schools in the early 1800s with later explicitly federal schools and their public school successors during and after the 1930s. But historians generally focus on the period from 1879 to the 1930s as the boarding school era.

HISTORY OF THE INDIAN BOARDING SCHOOLS

In 1879, the government opened the Carlisle Indian Industrial School, a boarding school for American Indian children in Carlisle, Pennsylvania, explicitly designed to separate children from their families and their culture and to train them for menial jobs.

The boarding school era was the brainchild of Army officer Richard Henry Pratt, a Civil War veteran who, in the years after the war, commanded the 10th United States Cavalry, a Black regiment stationed in the American West whose members Indigenous Americans nicknamed the “Buffalo Soldiers.” Pratt fought in the campaigns on the Plains from 1868 through 1875, when he was assigned to oversee 72 Cheyenne, Kiowa, Comanche, Arapaho, and Caddo prisoners of war at Fort Marion in St. Augustine, Florida (now known as the Castillo de San Marcos National Monument).

Many Indigenous prisoners at Fort Marion, taken from the dry Plains to the hot and humid coast of Florida where they were imprisoned in a cramped stone fort, quickly sickened and died. Pratt worked to upgrade conditions and to assimilate prisoners into U.S. systems by teaching them English, U.S. culture, Christianity, and how the American economy worked. He cut their hair, dressed them in military-type uniforms, and urged them to make art for sale to local tourists—it’s from here we get the world-famous collection of ledger art by the artists of Fort Marion—but focused on turning the former warriors and their families into menial workers.

After the Battle of the Little Bighorn in 1876 and the subsequent pursuit and surrender of leading Lakota bands throughout that year and the next, leading to the murder of Crazy Horse in 1877, popular opinion ran heavily toward simply corralling Indigenous Americans on reservations and waiting either for their assimilation or extermination. At the same time, with what seemed to be the end of the most serious of the Plains Wars, Army officers like Pratt had reason to worry that the downsizing of the U.S. Army would mean the end of their careers.

Indigenous survivors of Fort Marion returned home to see that the American government had no real plans for a thriving American Indian populace. There was little infrastructure to link them to the rest of the country to sell their art, and Indian agents rejected tribal members for jobs in favor of white cronies.

But Pratt considered his experiment at Fort Marion a great success, and he came to believe he could make his system work even more thoroughly by using a loophole in the treaties between Plains Tribes and the U.S. government to force Indigenous Americans to assimilate as children. He planned, he said, to “Kill the Indian and save the man.”

Treaties between Plains Indian Tribes and the government required the U.S. government to educate American Indian children—something their parents cared deeply about—but the treaties didn’t actually specify where the schools would be. So Pratt convinced the U.S. Army and officials at the Interior Department to give him the use of the Carlisle Barracks to open an industrial school, designed to teach American Indian children the skills necessary to be servants and menial workers.

In summer 1879, Pratt traveled to western reservations of the Lakotas and Dakotas, primarily, to gather up 82 children to begin his experiment in annihilating their culture from their minds. He forbade the practice of any aspect of Indigenous culture—language, religion, custom, clothing—and forced children to change their names, use English, practice Christianity, and wear clothing that mirrored that of Euro-American children.

Crowded together, many children died of disease; bereft of their family and culture, many died of heartache. Some found their newfound language and lessons tolerable, others ran away. For the next fifty years, the Carlisle model was the central model of government education for Indigenous children, with tens of thousands of children educated according to its methods.

In the 1920s the Institute for Government Research, later renamed the Brookings Institution, commissioned a study funded by the Rockefeller Institute—to make sure it would not reflect government bias—to investigate conditions among Indigenous Americans.

In 1928 that study, called the Meriam Report, condemned the conditions under which American Indians lived. It also emphasized the “deplorable health conditions” at the boarding schools, condemned the schools’ inappropriate focus on menial skills, and asserted that “[t]he most fundamental need in Indian education is a change in point of view.” In 1934 the Indian Reorganization Act reversed the policy of trying to eradicate Tribal cultures through boarding children away from their families, and introduced the teaching of Indian history and culture in federal schools.

But the boarding schools remain a central part of the experience of American Indians since the establishment of the U.S. government in North America, and the Federal Boarding School Initiative recommended that “[t]he U.S. Government should issue a formal acknowledgment of its role in adopting a national policy of forced assimilation of Indian children, and carrying out this policy through the removal and confinement of Indian children from their families and Indian Tribes and the Native Hawaiian Community and placement in the Federal Indian boarding school system.”

It continued: “The United States should accompany this acknowledgment with a formal apology to the individuals, families, and Indian Tribes that were harmed by U.S. policy.”

On October 25, 2024, President Joe Biden delivered that apology.

—

ORIGINAL POST

Notes:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/press-briefings/2024/10/24/press-gaggle-by-press-secretary-karine-jean-pierre-and-secretary-of-the-interior-deb-haaland-en-route-phoenix-az
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2024/10/25/remarks-by-president-biden-on-the-biden-harris-administrations-record-of-delivering-for-tribal-communities-including-keeping-his-promise-to-make-this-historic-visit-to-indian-country-lavee
https://www.bia.gov/sites/default/files/media_document/doi_federal_indian_boarding_school_initiative_investigative_report_vii_final_508_compliant.pdf
https://www.bia.gov/sites/default/files/dup/inline-files/bsi_investigative_report_may_2022_508.pdf
https://www.doi.gov/bryan-newland
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/110/hjres62
https://beinecke.library.yale.edu/collections/highlights/richard-henry-pratt-papers
https://web.archive.org/web/20170417085942/http://carlisleindian.dickinson.edu
https://americanhistory.si.edu/documentsgallery/exhibitions/ledger_drawing_2.html
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED087573.pdf
https://uusocietyamherst.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/UUSALogoFinalVersion.png 0 0 Webmaster https://uusocietyamherst.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/UUSALogoFinalVersion.png Webmaster2024-11-30 07:20:462025-04-01 13:17:08The story of the Indian Boarding Schools

Final Budget Document – FY 25

June 8, 2024/in Uncategorized/by John Gerber
https://uusocietyamherst.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/UUSALogoFinalVersion.png 0 0 John Gerber https://uusocietyamherst.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/UUSALogoFinalVersion.png John Gerber2024-06-08 19:28:522024-06-08 20:34:01Final Budget Document – FY 25

Ministry in Governance

June 8, 2024/in Uncategorized/by John Gerber

Co-presidents Letter for May 2024

One of the first books I read when I joined the UUSA Board of Trustees nearly three years ago was Governance and Ministry by Dan Hotchkiss.  This reference is a standard read for board leaders of many faiths and helped ground me in the work of the board.  About the same time there was a minor kerfuffle within the congregation about the word “ministry.”  Some of us seemed to want to reserve the word ministry for the designated minister, and others saw the work of our many committees as “ministering” to the congregation.  Personally, I believe that everything we do is ministry. 

I have come to understand ministry as service.  In our case, it would be service consistent with UU Principles and Values.  One of my problems with the Dan Hotchkiss book is that it seems to imply that “governance” and “ministry” are two separate functions.  But this is changing as the feature article in the most recent issue of UU World titled “Shared Ministry Helps UU Communities Thrive” suggests. 

The other book I read (yes, I’m a bit of a book nerd) early in my tenure on the board was adrienne maree brown’s modern classic, Emergent Strategy: Shaping Change, Changing Worlds.  This is a deeply spiritual book that offers us hope for a better world.  Brown guides us toward strategic and radical change in our institutions and our lives in ways that are consistent with our 8th Principle (to dismantle racism and other oppressions in ourselves and our institutions).  One of her teachings is called intentional adaptation.

We all adapt to changing conditions, often as a knee-jerk reaction to an unexpected crisis (like a pandemic) or stress (like a budget shortfall).  The key to “intentional adaptation” is to change in response to changing conditions while holding tightly to our mission, but not necessarily to specific pre-conceived outcomes.  Rather than following a “five-year plan” we must “build the road while walking.”  Strategies that result in success will emerge in non-linear, iterative, and perhaps unexpected ways.  It requires faith.  It requires hope.  It requires love. 

This sounds like “ministry” to me.

This past year, one of the adaptations that we have experimented with on the UUSA Board of Trustees is the practice of sociocracy, known in UUA circles as dynamic governance.  Those of us familiar with the competitive, rough and tumble form of governance known as New England Town Meeting guided by Robert’s Rules, benefited from learning a different way to deliberate and make decisions. It has been an interesting and gratifying experiment. We are still learning.

I see sociocracy as a means of intentional adaptation for UU’s.  Sociocracy is deeply embedded in a commitment to the worth and dignity of every person (First Principle), justice, equity, and compassion (Second Principle), the search for truth and meaning (Fourth Principle), and as mentioned, it allows us to practice our Eighth Principle.  Sociocracy has helped us practice governance as a form of ministry. 

If any UUSA committee, ministry, team, or circle wants to learn more about how the tools of sociocracy might help you in your own work, please contact me to arrange a consultation with members of the UUSA Sociocracy Support Circle.   It’s another form of ministry.

In community,

John Gerber

https://uusocietyamherst.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/UUSALogoFinalVersion.png 0 0 John Gerber https://uusocietyamherst.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/UUSALogoFinalVersion.png John Gerber2024-06-08 15:30:022024-06-08 15:30:03Ministry in Governance

Come Sing a Song with Me

October 7, 2023/in Uncategorized/by Webmaster

A Service on Welcome and Belonging by Alyson Bull

This past Sunday, I had the experience of being in the sanctuary as it transitioned from pre-service set up to a room filled with a congregation ready to worship together. I watched as a simple, “Good morning,” said with a smile, beckoned people into the sanctuary. When one “Good morning” was voiced, others echoed the call, and it continued down the aisle as people searched for a spot to settle in.  As the room filled up, some people were deeply engaged in conversation and others were sitting quietly not talking to anyone. 

I began to wonder how people wanted to feel as they entered the service on Sunday morning. What do people need to feel welcome?

Let’s reflect for a moment about what you need to feel welcome and included as part of a community. What about a space, a place, a community makes it feel welcoming? What do the people do or not do? What do they say or leave unsaid? 

And how do you know you belong somewhere? What are the indicators that it is a place where you are seen and valued, a place that accepts you as you are?

How do you know you belong?

[Time for the congregation to reflect] I invite you to turn to someone near you and share your thoughts with one another. What came up for you when you thought about those questions? 

Providing a warm welcome that is inclusive of all people is a critical component to fostering a deeply connected, strong and resilient community where people feel a rich sense of belonging. 

That doesn’t just magically happen. Being welcoming and inclusive is a community practice that each one of us must be intentional about and prioritize.  

It can be challenging in well-established, mid-sized congregations to remain open and inviting. So many of us do so much to keep this place running, and there are many people here who have deep and life-long relationships, that it can feel difficult for some to make their way in and find where they fit. I have found that there are sometimes barriers to making meaningful connections with one another here. 

WHY is all of this important? Beyond growing our membership numbers, filling the pews, and balancing our budgets, why is it important that this community be a welcoming place where people feel a deep sense of belonging?

[Time for the congregation to reflect] What do you think? Turn to someone near you and tell them why you think it is important that this community be a welcoming place where people feel a deep sense of belonging.

I would love to hear your answers to that question after the service. 

Here is the answer that I am working on currently: To be healthy, whole people, we need one another’s support especially when navigating tumultuous times. To survive the rapidly changing landscape of the modern world, we must build INTERCONNECTED, DIVERSE, and RESILIENT COMMUNITIES. 

I have experienced the power of a resilient community and relied on it for my family’s survival.  

In the spring of 2020, my wife Annie and I were expecting twins. They were born in late March 2020, about two weeks into the pandemic shutdown. 

It was this community who kept us afloat during the insanity of caring for newborn twins during a global pandemic. The Caring Circle’s meal train kept us fed, kept groceries in our cupboards, and got our trash to the dump each week. Religious Education friends made sure that we had our first cloth masks and a coveted N-95 so we could protect our vulnerable babes from the virus. We received phone calls, cards and casseroles that kept our bodies and our souls nourished. We introduced the twins to the world through our front window and over Zoom, and you waved joyfully and blew kisses to express all the love that social distancing would allow. 

I know that I am not the only person here who has experienced life-supporting care from this congregation. Many people here have expressed how deeply connected they feel to one another and to this place. And I also know that not everyone has felt or experienced that here – at least, not yet. 

We have the foundation for building a resilient and Beloved community here; but it is one we must continue to build and nurture so that we are prepared to handle whatever chaos, crisis, or curveball life throws at us– individually and collectively. 

We must not grow complacent or rest comfortably in the relationships we already have. For our congregation to thrive, we must continue to commit to providing a radical welcome to all those who walk through our doors. And we must work to ensure that the people who are already here are connected in meaningful ways. 

We must build an INTERCONNECTED, DIVERSE, and RESILIENT COMMUNITY.

A community that actively works to reject white supremacy culture, a community that upholds its covenants, holds one another accountable, and allows space for repentance and repair; one that celebrates life’s milestones – gathering together to share all their joys and all their sorrows. A community where each individual is able to show up as a whole, fully seen human being valued for ALL of who they are.  

When I think about big changes like this, I feel overwhelmed.  But then I remember what I have learned through my many years of teaching; it often takes just one small shift, one key intervention to unlock a world of possibility. And the key, I have found, is usually RELATIONSHIP. 

Relationships are built on connection and connection is cultivated through conversation and shared experience. 

So, what can we do to cultivate these connections? 

  • We can be intentional in offering one another a warm welcome each week. 
  • We can be courageous as we introduce ourselves to one another. 
  • We can learn each other’s names. 
  • We can mix up where we sit in the sanctuary and who we talk to at social hour. 

Let’s work together to build a resilient community. Let’s build it together one conversation at a time.

Photo by cyrus gomez on Unsplash

https://uusocietyamherst.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Welcoming_cyrus-gomez-x4HjxzOoIxU-unsplash.jpeg 1385 924 Webmaster https://uusocietyamherst.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/UUSALogoFinalVersion.png Webmaster2023-10-07 08:38:202023-10-07 08:38:21Come Sing a Song with Me

FY 24 Finance Committee Recommendations

April 30, 2023/in Uncategorized/by Webmaster

To: UUSA Board

From: Finance Committee
Re: Possible Budget Shortfall for FY’24

Hello, friends.

The Finance Committee met on Monday, 4/24, to discuss the possible budget shortfall and to suggest possible solutions to get to a balanced budget.

It probably goes without saying, but the FC wants to stress that most of the suggested cuts are not in any way the desire of the FC or a comment about what ought to happen. They are a means to an end, which is a balanced budget, given a set of mostly immutable facts.

Our target was to come up with additions to revenue or cuts to expenditures equaling $23,000. Here are our ideas:

INCREASING REVENUE
AMOUNTRATIONALE
$2000 in interest incomeWe have not factored in our budget interest earnings on our checking accounts at Florence, and we are looking into risk-free ways to generate 2K or more on our substantial cash on hand.
$2,500 transfer from reservesThis transfer from reserves (ERTC if/when it materializes) would pay the one-time sabbatical costs.
REDUCING EXPENSES
$500 lower electricity budgetThis is based on observation of current year use.
$1000 reduction to music budgetThis can be distributed among expected costs as music determines is best
$2700 – elimination of transfer to capital and unrestricted reserve 
$500 – cut from REThese savings would be sought in various smaller lines.
$2500 reduction to program expensesThis is based in part on observation of low use of budgeted funds generally.
$2000 UUA “dues”This is simply a cost-reducing suggestion.
$6500 reduction of COLA for staff from 8% to 4% 
$1825 reduction of professional expenses for minister during sabbaticalThis could also be accomplished by a transfer in from reserves in this amount.
$500 cut from Kitchen expenseWe are looking into other sources to make up this money

TOTAL: $22,525

Additional thoughts:

  • The Finance Committee is exploring additional/alternative savings in several other areas that are currently speculative. (For example, we are reaching out to our insurer to see if there are savings to be had by combining our liability with our worker compensation coverage; we are approaching Craig’s Doors about a possible donation to offset some kitchen expenses.) We will report any significant findings that would alter the picture presented here.
  • We have noted that for previous years (and this current year) we are in a position to realize a surplus. This happens when events planned in April play out differently than anticipated over the ensuing 14-15 months 

    While the Finance Committee would not advise making budget commitments that will need to be honored indefinitely on the basis of hoped-for outcomes, it does seem reasonable to risk erring on optimistic side about some speculative revenue sources with the understanding that we have surplus from the previous year to cover a small shortfall.

    For example, we would consider increasing anticipated revenue from rentals or possibly fundraising by a few thousand with the knowledge that the previous year’s surplus would cover that.

    We do understand and are paying attention to the fact that there are several claims on our reserves and we have to be careful not to overpromise.


    Respectfully submitted,

    The Finance Committee
https://uusocietyamherst.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/UUSALogoFinalVersion.png 0 0 Webmaster https://uusocietyamherst.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/UUSALogoFinalVersion.png Webmaster2023-04-30 19:28:572023-04-30 19:29:42FY 24 Finance Committee Recommendations

Events

13th Annual Pocumtuck Homelands Festival
13th Annual Pocumtuck Homelands Festival
2 Aug 26
Ministry of Welcome and Membership Picnic @ Groff Park
Ministry of Welcome and Membership Picnic @ Groff Park
9 Aug 26

Unitarian Universalist Society of Amherst

Address:
121 N Pleasant St
Amherst, MA 01002

Click here for directions

Mailing address:
P.O. Box 502
Amherst, MA 01004

Telephone: 413-253-2848
Press 1 for the office
Press 2 for the minister

Subscribe to Weekly Announcements

This field is required.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Donate to the UUSA

To make a donation to the UUSA: Click here

Subscribe to our YouTube Channel

YouTube
UUA logo
LGBTQ Welcoming CongregationGreen Sanctuary
© Copyright - Unitarian Universalist Society of Amherst
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility
  • UUA Bookstore
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top