Who Has Time for Collective Liberation?
When I preached the glossary service three weeks ago, I encountered a question that was too big to fit into the time we had for that service. It was about the term “liberal religion.” We have a tagline on our letterhead and now on our website that reads “A liberal religious light since 1893.”
Since we just had the November election, I want to be clear that liberal in the sense of liberal religion does not necessarily describe the electoral politics of our congregation or the Unitarian Universalist religious movement. We don’t endorse any candidates or parties. I do speak about how our values translate into public and collective power. Liberal religion is a term that describes not what a religion believes, or how its people vote, but how its beliefs work, though those things frequently do go hand in hand.
Liberal religion means, broadly, religion that is not limited by fixed doctrine but instead contains a framework for further evolution. Many religions have a liberal tradition–we’re not the only ones. In my seminary education alone, I read and studied with scholars from liberal Protestant Christian, Catholic, Jewish, Muslim, and Buddhist traditions. If this is new to you, just because you haven’t experienced it doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. Let me know if you want a bibliography.
In the Unitarian Universalist context, we have made a tradition of outgrowing our own previously held doctrine. We don’t have a creed here. We do have shared values that guide our ethical decision-making. Those shared values are Justice, Equity, Transformation, Pluralism, Interdependence, and Generosity, grounded in a foundation of Love. Conscience, reason, and inspiration are our tools in making ethical decisions.
To go back to 19th century Unitarianism, older than our congregation, Theodore Parker preached about the Transient and Permanent aspects of Christianity. Doctrine on the nature of Christ, the miracles, the things Jesus did two thousand years ago, all of that was transient; the teachings of love are permanent, and that is what we carry with us. And you know what, a lot of what Theodore Parker wrote turned out to be transient too.
Liberal religion expects to grow and change. I really hope that one hundred years from now, all of my ethical commitments like:
- All genders are sacred and trans people are free to live as their truest selves
- Migration is a human right in an unstable world. People need the freedom to migrate and the safety to not migrate.
- All people deserve freedom and a say in their government
- All people have the right to food, housing, healthcare, education, and support throughout their lives
I hope all of those ethical statements sound ridiculously outdated someday, and the sooner the better, because then we will have built a world where those things are taken for granted.
But the real question here, from the person who submitted this term for the glossary service was, ‘Is there such a thing as radical religion?’ I don’t frequently hear those words together, though Unitarian Universalists and others do talk about radical meaning grasping something at the root, getting the whole metaphorical carrot, I guess, and not just the leaves.
I more frequently hear us talk about the difference between liberal theologies and liberation theologies. Liberal religion, with its liberal theologies, is concerned with the growth and freedom of the individuals who practice and believe them. Liberation theologies are concerned with generating freedom where it’s missing. In seminary, I studied Latin American liberation theology, Black liberation theology, Indigenous and Asian and African liberation theologies, women’s and queer liberation theologies. My friend Rebecca Stevens-Walter is a children’s liberation theologian. Liberation theologies ask what does salvation mean for someone who is oppressed?
I find this question fascinating when we hold it in the context of Universalism, which is to say that all people are loved without reservation and deserve what they need to thrive; liberation theology reminds us that those of us who face particular oppressions might need more than one-size-fits-all salvation. It’s why we have Black Lives Matter and a Pride flag on the outside of our building. Sometimes loving everybody means being on the side of people particularly. Love makes demands of our consciences, and loving everybody means dismantling oppression, for the freedom and healing of both the oppressed and the oppressor.
Liberation theology in a theistic frame says that God is on the side of the oppressed. God never stops loving everyone, but sometimes love means stopping harm, righting wrongs, making sure the people who don’t have enough get what they need. You can see this idea in the ministry of Bishop William Barber, Rev. Liz Theoharis, and the multi-faith coalition at the heart of the Poor People’s Campaign. It says in the Bible and the religious texts of many traditions that how we treat those who are poor, those who have less power, matters more than who can offer the best sacrifice.
The world has so many needs right now, and always, and none of them is more important, even if they seem to take turns as most dire and urgent. Food insecurity matters, and healthcare, and safety for immigrants and trans and queer people. And disaster response. And really everything. In the Beloved Community, it all matters, from ending genocide down to the tiniest animal shelter.
I often ask you to imagine the Beloved Community, where everyone has what they need to thrive, where we no longer experience racism, poverty, militarism, where we build positive peace and settle conflict constructively, without violence. I have never lived in the Beloved Community. It has not yet existed, at least in the sense of everyone in the whole world having what we need.
But I have experienced it in tiny glimmers. A holiday dinner where everyone, including diabetics and vegans and omnivores and food-allergics sat down hungry and got up satisfied. A meeting where people came together broken and in conflict and decided to meet the humanity in one another, not to compromise or even agree to disagree but simply to hear one another. Maybe even an election like this past Tuesday, in which voters all across the country repudiated the ongoing persecution of poor people, disabled people, immigrants, and trans and queer people by voting for change.
Like with most things, collective liberation, I don’t know how to get to the end goal from these tiny glimmers. I don’t have a plan. But like any kid who grew up with the Ghostbusters, the X-Men, and the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, I believe that having a plan is not nearly as important as having a team. Having a team means that we don’t all need to have the same gifts, and it’s better if we don’t.

Deepa Iyer’s children’s book We Are the Builders, as well as her helpful workbook Social Change Now: A Guide for Reflection and Connection propose ten roles for social change.
- Frontline responders: These are the folks who mobilize quickly, who always seem ready to help and calm in the storm. The first example I can think of here is LUCE, responding to ICE detentions. LUCE was part of the ICE bystander training we hosted last month, and I am so grateful that they’re running the hotline for ICE sightings, verifying them, and helping those who have been detained and their families.
- Visionaries: These are the people who know where we’re going, the ones who ask if the direction we are heading will get us to our ultimate goal. Sometimes these are the ones who wind up at the microphone at a protest, the ones who reconnect us to our hope.
- Builders: These folks do details, solve the problems, and get it done. We have a lot of builders in this congregation, and I appreciate you all so much.
- Disrupters: These are the people who take risks to call out injustice. Think of whistleblowers. Think of people in inflatable frog costumes pointing out the cruelty of our government.
- Caregivers: These are the folks who make it safe for others to get what they need and feel their feelings. We don’t always name the caregivers as an important part of movements, but they are the ones who remind us to rest, make sure we eat, ask us how we’re taking care of ourselves. We would fall apart without them.
- Experimenters: These are the out-of-the-box thinkers, the ones who are willing to try new things and see what works, what doesn’t, and what we learn along the way. They call us beyond our comfort zones and have faith that we can survive and learn from things that don’t go according to plan.
- Weavers: These are coalition-builders, the ones who find what we have in common across perceived differences. They keep the larger ecosystem in mind and can look beyond self-interest. They build bridges between communities.
- Storytellers: These are the poets, the documentary filmmakers, the photographers, the ones who make a narrative out of the moments and complex characters out of headlines. They connect the movement to its humanity.
- Healers: These are the people who move our society and movements, as well as our congregation, into healthier ways of being and interacting. This looks like practicing moving through emotions together, repairing relationships, sitting with grief.
- Guides: These are the wise elders, regardless of age, who translate their own experience for others to use, who know that some things may be different this time around, but their thoughtfulness can be a resource.
The disrupters and weavers, for example, don’t understand things the same way, or work the same way, but both roles, or really all ten, are necessary for creating a future that is actually for all of us. And infighting between people whose ultimate goals are aligned is a huge distraction from our collective liberation. Which is not to say that we need to play nice with those who dehumanize us and those we love, but the work we do to come together across difference is part of the work of building Beloved Community.
Nobody is all of these social change roles. I tell myself that, over and over, and sometimes it sinks in that I, or you, don’t have to be good at all of them. Because together, we have one another. Collective liberation needs all of us working in our different ways, not all doing the same thing. Once again, we’re called to connection not perfection.
If you feel guilty that protests make you anxious, if you don’t know the right thing to say when times are hard, if you hate phone-banking, that’s okay. It’s just not your role. Do you believe me when I say that there are people who feel the joy of their community at a protest, who actually enjoy knocking on strangers’ doors to canvass for an issue, who get a thrill from asking for donations? They really exist. I encourage you to find your role in making the world a better place, the place that makes you feel alive and connected to your purpose. If you have time or money to give, and you can do so with joy, then you’ve found your place just right.
And you know what, maybe what you can do right now is survive, and that is enough. The world is a better place with you in it. As Julian Jamaica Soto says, “All of us need all of us to make it.”
So maybe sometimes it feels like we don’t have time to get everybody free, but it won’t be Beloved Community until everyone belongs. We’re not piecemeal struggling people up into privilege. We’re called to build something so much better, joyfully interdependent, for a better world than we have ever known. So, it’s not so much who has time for collective liberation as who has time to wait?
None of us can do everything, and all of us can do something. All of us need all of us to make it. May we each find the gifts we can offer with delight. Amen.
To view the sermon, click the link below.
Featured photo by Kelly Cristine on Unsplash



John Gerber; September 21, 2025





